October202011

McAfee loses high-profile researcher and CTO


* Worldwide CTO George Kurtz leaves at end of OctoberBy Jim FinkleBOSTON, Oct 18 (Reuters) - Two senior technology executives have resigned from McAfee Inc, the anti-virus software maker that Intel Corp bought in February, according to a company spokeswoman.Worldwide Chief Technology Officer George Kurtz, who helped lead the company’s product strategy, will leave at the end of this month, the spokeswoman said.Kurtz could not be reached for comment.Vice President Dmitri Alperovitch, a highly regarded threat researcher whose work at the company help give it a reputation for conducting cutting-edge research on hacking, quietly left last month, without the company issuing any announcement.Alperovitch led a research team that produced several high-profile studies on suspected Chinese-government backed hackers during his tenure at McAfee.Those studies included a landmark January 2010 report in which Alperovitch coined the term “Operation Aurora” to describe attacks suspected by Chinese hackers on Google Inc and several dozen other companies. His team identified the malware used in those attacks, which exploited previously unknown flows in Microsoft Corp’s Internet Explorer browser.In August his team uncovered “Operation Shady RAT,” the biggest series of cyber attacks disclosed to date, which involved the infiltration of the networks of 72 organizations including the United Nations, governments and companies around the world.Alperovitch, who has been doing consulting since he left the company, declined to comment on the reason for his resignation.Company spokeswoman Heather Edell said the company is currently looking for replacements for the two executives.

October172011

Citigroup shutting down prop trading unit -CFO


Banks including Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley have already unwound similar businesses in preparation for stricter government regulation under the Volcker Rule.The Volcker Rule, which goes into effect next year, is aiming to prevent banks from making risky trades by prohibiting short-term trading for their own profit.Citi spokeswoman Danielle Romero-Apsilos said Citi’s Equity Principal Strategies unit, is a “de minimis part of Citi’s overall trading operation.”“As it does not fit with Citi’s business model under the impending Volcker rule, it is in the process of being wound down,” Romero-Apsilos said in an emailed statement.

8PM

Nikkei to slip from 6-week high on euro reality check


Wall Street shares fell on Monday after Germany said that a summit of EU leaders next Sunday would not produce a miracle cure for the euro zone’s sovereign debt crisis.”Although markets were not expecting the debt crisis to be resolved overnight, shares prices are likely to succumb to profit-taking after the rally,” said Hiroichi Nishi, equity general manager at SMBC Nikko Securities.On Monday, the Nikkei added 1.5 percent to 8,879.60, its highest finish since Sept. 2, while the broader Topix index gained 1.8 percent to 761.88. Turnover for the Tokyo Stock Exchange’s main board, however, was its lowest since late December.Market players said the Nikkei was likely to trade between 8,700 and 8,850 on Tuesday.Nikkei futures in Chicago closed at 8,795, down 105 points from the Osaka close.Investors, who have scooped up exporters such as Sony during the market’s rally in the past week, may shift back to domestic-demand oriented firms, Nishi said.———————————MARKET SNAPSHOT @ 2252 GMT ——————INSTRUMENT LAST PCT CHG NET CHG S&P 500 1200.86 -1.94% -23.720 USD/JPY 76.86 0.04% 0.030 10-YR US TSY YLD 2.155 — -0.096 SPOT GOLD 1671.46 0.03% 0.560 US CRUDE 86.27 -0.13% -0.110 DOW JONES 11397.00 -2.13% -247.49 ——————————————————————————————-> Germany’s caution on debt plan sinks Wall St > Euro sags as Germany undercuts hope on crisis plan > Prices rise as Germany cools euro-zone hopes > Gold falls with riskier assets on Europe worries > Oil falls as Germany dampens hope for debt planSTOCKS TO WATCH— OlympusOlympus told investors on Monday that it may take legal action against ousted Chief Executive Michael Woodford, accusing him of disclosing confidential information in media interviews where he discussed alleged improper M&A payments.— NTT DoCoMo IncNTT DoCoMo Inc will raise its smartphone sales outlook for the current fiscal by more than 2 million units to about 8 million as it gains from strong demand for the devices, the Nikkei business daily said.— Tokyo ElectricTokyo Electric Power Co is looking to request around 700 billion yen ($9.12 billion) in financial aid from a government-backed institution set up to support nuclear disaster compensation, the Nikkei said.— Honda , other Thai floods victimsHonda decided to cut production in Malaysia due to disruption in parts supplies as its factory in Thailand suffered from flooding, Nikkei reported on Tuesday.At least 300 Japanese companies have been affected by flooding in Thailand and it could be months before all are fully up and running again, the Japan External Trade Organisation’s (JETRO) Thailand head said on Monday.

3PM

U.S. not “trying that hard” on exports: GE’s Immelt


That is a big concern since boosting exports is one of the best ways the nation can tackle the stubbornly high unemployment that is leading a growing number of Americans to question how well the economic system is working.”We’re not trying that hard,” Immelt told a Thomson Reuters Newsmaker event in New York on Monday. “We haven’t really tried as hard as we can to compete, educate and sell our products around the world, and I think we can do better.”Still, the head of the largest U.S. conglomerate and a top adviser to the Obama administration on jobs and the economy believes the United States can improve. He noted that GE expects to generate 60 percent of its sales outside its home country this year.He held out Germany — home to one of GE’s biggest rivals, Siemens AG — as an example of a wealthy country that has been successful in pushing exports.”Chancellor (Angela) Merkel flies from Berlin to Beijing, there’s 25 German CEOs that go on the plane right behind her. And they connect the dots. They play hard, they play to win,” Immelt said.President Barack Obama, he added, “has been out driving and pushing to try to double exports in the next five years. I think we can compete very well. But we’re not all-in the same way that the Germans are all-in.”The nation’s economic malaise, now in its third year, has left many Americans angry and frustrated, Immelt said, and people in power need to empathize.”Unemployment is 9.1 percent. Underemployment is much higher than that, particularly among young people that don’t have a college degree,” Immelt said. “It is natural to assume that people are angry, and I think we have to be empathetic and understand that people are not feeling great.”A large and diverse group of protesters, who complain that the U.S. economic system is no longer working to the benefit of a large slice of the nation’s population, has been a visible presence on Wall Street for a month now. The movement, known as “Occupy Wall Street,” has spread around the country.The protesters complain that the billions of dollars the U.S. government spent during the recession to prop up financial companies, including GE, have allowed banks to earn large profits without benefiting average Americans.GROWTH THE ONLY ANSWERThe head of the world’s largest maker of jet engines and electric turbines said he regarded stronger growth as the only real answer to the rising disillusionment.”The only way to solve this specific problem is growth,” Immelt said. “If unemployment comes down, people will feel better. If unemployment goes up, people will feel worse, no matter what goes on Wall Street.”Immelt said the gap between the pay of CEOs and average Americans is adding to tensions.”The discrepancy is certainly one of the problems today in terms of why people feel the system is unfair,” Immelt said.But he said that lowering CEO pay would do little to lower unemployment. Immelt received compensation worth $21.4 million last year, including a $4 million bonus that was his first since 2007.”If CEO pay goes way down and unemployment is 12 percent, people are still going to feel bad,” he said. “It is a symptom but it is not the problem.”Immelt is confident that U.S. business can compete with rivals in emerging markets such as China and also profit in developing markets. He cited Russia as a major focus over the next decade and said GE is also investing in resource-rich African countries including Mozambique, Angola, Nigeria and South Africa.GE expects to generate more than 60 percent of its revenue outside the United States this year. Analysts, on average, expect it to record revenue of $148.13 billion.SEES SLOW EUROPEAN GROWTHConcerns that Greece could default on its debt and threaten the European and U.S. financial systems have rattled the world economy in recent weeks, pushing down stocks and prompting big banks including Bank of America Corp and JPMorgan Chase & Co to begin laying off staffers.”The most likely case is that Europe has slow growth for a long period of time,” Immelt said. “The process is going to have to be solved inside of Europe.”Last week, the White House advisory panel Immelt heads submitted a report to the Obama administration saying that attracting more foreign capital, being more aggressive in energy policy, and investing in infrastructure could help create jobs in an economy struggling with high unemployment.Immelt, a lifelong Republican, has drawn fire from some GE shareholders for his work with the Democratic Obama administration. The CEO defended his role, saying GE executives have long had a voice in Washington.”People need to try,” he said. “I’d rather be in the arena trying than not doing what I can to help.”Partisanship in Washington is hurting the nation’s economy by slowing efforts to reform the system, Immelt said, adding that he worried that anti-Wall Street rhetoric hurts people other than those it is aimed at.”If your first comment is Wall Street is horrible and you’re in a position of leadership, you don’t hurt Wall Street,” Immelt said. “But there is some guy in Illinois that’s not going to build a factory today because he thinks the financial system is horrible. That’s my point. This is a time when leaders, people like me, should be trying to do things that are more convergent, because ultimately words count.”

October142011

CORRECTED - Regulators close four small U.S. banks


Most of the banks that have failed so far this year have had less than $1 billion in assets.The pace of closures has slowed this year and FDIC officials project the final 2011 tally will be less than the 2010 total of 157.In the latest round of closures, authorities closed:— First State Bank, Cranford, New Jersey, which had two branches, about $204.4 million in assets and $201.2 million in deposits as of June 30.All deposit accounts have been transferred to Northfield Bank, of Staten Island, New York.— Piedmont Community Bank, Gray, Georgia, which had two branches, about $201.7 million in assets and $181.4 million in deposits.State Bank and Trust Co, Macon, Georgia, agreed to assume all of he deposits of Piedmont Community Bank.— Country Bank, of Aledo, Illinois, which had two branches, $190.6 million in assets and $167.5 million in deposits.Blackhawk Bank & Trust, of Milan, Illinois, agreed to assume all the deposits and $113.3 million of the failed bank’s assets.— Blue Ridge Savings Bank Inc, Asheville, North Carolina, which had 10 branches, about $161 million in assets and $158.7 million in deposits.Bank of North Carolina, Thomasville, North Carolina, is assuming all of the deposits of the failed bank.The branches of the failed banks will re-open as branches of their successors, the FDIC said.The fund used by the FDIC to cover the cost of failures is recovering from the hit it took during the 2007-2009 financial crisis.On Monday, the agency provided an update that showed the fund was in positive territory, $3.9 billion, at the end of the second quarter following seven quarters that ended with a negative balance.

1PM

U.S. government eyes risk-sharing in housing bonds


Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac buy mortgages from lenders to free up cash for banks to make more loans. The two companies then repackage the loans for sale to investors as securities and charge fees to guarantee the debt.Under the private-sector risk-sharing idea, they would begin to issue some bonds without a federal guarantee.Investors in those securities would receive a higher return to compensate them for the greater risk of losses, according to the people familiar with the matter. The Wall Street Journal first reported on the possibility on Friday.The idea is just in the concept stage. The administration could consider a variety of ways to get investors to take on more credit risk, one source said.The administration and housing regulators are eyeing the possibility of using derivatives or relying on greater mortgage insurance coverage for the loans underlying the bonds to spur private-sector interest, according to the sources.Any final plan on investor risk sharing would require the approval of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, which oversees Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.The Obama administration would like to begin testing ideas to bring in greater private-sector involvement as early as next year, the sources said.The approach under consideration would reduce the long-term risk exposure of Fannie and Freddie. Together with the Federal Housing Administration, the companies now fund roughly 90 percent of all new U.S. mortgages.FHFA’s acting director, Edward DeMarco, said in a speech last month that his agency is considering various alternatives to attract private investors to the market through different types of risk-sharing structures.

October122011

UPDATE 1-Johnson Controls sees Q4 profit, FY12 below Street view


The company, which will report fourth-quarter results on Oct. 27, said it expects an adjusted quarterly profit of 75 cents a share and sales of about $10.7 billion.Analsyts on an average are expecting earnings of 78 cents a share, on revenue of $10.5 billion, according to Thomson Reuters I/B/E/S.The company forecast 2012 earnings of $2.85-$3.00 per share, on sales of about $44.2 billion.Analsyts on an average are expecting 2012 earnings of $3.10 a share, on revenue of $44.6 billion, according to Thomson Reuters I/B/E/S.The company expects automotive production in 2012 to be higher in North America and China, and relatively flat in Europe.Johnson Controls also said it sees margin improvements in all three of its businesses — Automotive Experience, Power Solutions and Building Efficiency — for 2012.The global building efficiency market is forecast to improve slightly in 2012.Shares of the company closed at $30.14 on Tuesday on the New York Stock Exchange.

4AM

Areva reassessing business in Germany - paper


“We could conclude that we will discontinue certain activities,” the paper quoted Oursel as saying.Areva employs 6,000 staff at eight sites in Germany and generates 1.3 billion euros ($1.8 billion) turnover there, the paper said.Oursel would not rule out job cuts in Germany, Handelsblatt reported. “What is clear, however, is that Areva will stay in Germany,” the CEO said. “The nuclear energy exit also offers us chances.”Oursel cited the group’s presence in renewable energy, adding Areva was also considering setting up a global centre in Germany for dismantling nuclear reactors.Germany decided earlier this year to phase out nuclear energy by 2022 and increase the amount of renewable energy it produces. ($1 = 0.733 euro)

4AM

Bain to buy Japan restaurant chain for $3.4 billion: source


Bain Capital began talks with Nomura Principal Finance to buy Skylark last year. Negotiations were put on hold after the March earthquake and slowed again in August after an outbreak of dysentery traced to Skylark restaurants.Talks between Bain and Nomura Principal are in the final stages and the two sides aim to reach an agreement by the end of the month before Nomura Holdings reports its earnings for the July-September quarter, the source said, speaking on condition of anonymity because the deal is not yet public.Nomura Holdings, Japan’s largest brokerage, said in a statement that media reports on the deal did not represent announcements by the company.Officials at Bain and Skylark declined to comment.In dollar terms, the $3.4 billion price tag is the same as in March, before the earthquake delayed the deal.Nomura Principal, the broker’s buyout unit, has been unloading portfolio companies, agreeing to sell ball bearing maker Tsubaki Nakashima Co to Carlyle Group CYL.UL for about $800 million earlier this year.Nomura Principal originally invested in Skylark in 2006 through a management buyout with UK private equity firm CVC Capital Partners CVC.UL. It currently controls a 77.8 percent stake in the restaurant chain along with other investors with money in a Nomura fund.

October112011

What did you say your name was?


Let’s see who’s been commenting on Reuters stories and blogs in recent days and weeks. There’s gadfly, WeNotMe, Blisterpearls, northboundgirl, Snowshoes and JacktheBear, among others. I strongly suspect those are not their real names. I don’t mean to call out these particular commenters, and I’m happy to see our readers taking the time to engage in robust discussion on Reuters.com. But I’m beginning to think our discussion would be even more robust and insightful if those making comments signed their real names. News organizations have grappled with how to handle reader comments practically since the dawn of online media. When I was at MSNBC.com in the 1990s we had message boards that at first were heavily monitored (at a fairly high cost) and then were largely unmonitored. By 1998, no matter what the purported subject of the board, the discussion would be taken over by frenzied postings on the Clinton-Lewinsky scandal. Some organizations have taken a very laissez-faire approach to reader comments, allowing anything to be posted and taking down only the most egregiously offensive comments after the fact. Others have taken a much more labor-intensive–and expensive–approach, moderating all comments before they’re published. Some have banned anonymous comments. Most are somewhere in the middle. I spoke with Reuters general manager for global consumer media, Keith McAllister, about the Reuters.com approach. “We want our users to be as involved as possible in Reuters.com,” Keith said. “User comments, particularly, help us move stories beyond our own reporting and analysis to unpredictably interesting and valuable places. We learn from (users) and, we believe, (users) learn from each other.” He added: “We are also zealous guardians of the quality of the Reuters.com community because so many of you rely on our site to be a place of serious and informed debate. That’s why we ask users to register to comment and why–in the near future–we’ll take the additional step of clearing each new user’s first comment.” I think that’s a smart move that will make the debate in the comments sections even smarter. Still, I wonder if we should tackle the question of anonymity. The Washington Post’s Gene Weingarten explored the subject of anonymous, vitriolic comments and asked in an online poll if readers who file comments should be required to identify themselves. As of this writing, about 46 percent say no and 41 percent say yes. New technologies have offered more sophisticated and powerful monitoring and registration tools, but in the end it all comes down to how much news organizations are willing to spend and to whether we fundamentally believe that people should be allowed to comment anonymously or be required to identify themselves. Print newspapers and magazines only publish signed letters to the editor and almost all verify the sender’s identity before publication. But again, this costs money and time. Most news websites encourage comments and allow a great deal of freedom for commenters to say pretty much anything they want as long as it isn’t hate speech or obscene. The result is indeed a free-for-all of opinion, from right to left and, in some cases, well outside the generally accepted bounds of reality. Isn’t this a good thing? the argument goes. Shouldn’t we encourage as much discussion as possible? I’ve always thought so. But lately I wonder if the discussion is really serving the needs of our audience. As I read the comments on stories about the health care debate in the United States, so many seemed be little more than pre-cooked soundbites and talking points of the left and the right. There is little actual discussion as partisans on both sides fire salvos of invective at each other. And on stories that deal with Middle East, the divide is even more pronounced. Is this useful, or is it more like shouting at the television set–and just about as effective? So what? I’ve been told. Is this really any different than Speaker’s Corner in London’s Hyde Park, where speakers can mount a soapbox and expound on pretty much anything they want to? Well, actually it is. In Hyde Park, you can see who’s doing the speaking. Would the online debate among commenters be stifled by requiring commenters to sign their real names? I suspect some would be less likely to want to attach their names to their opinions and some would sign false names but I also believe we might get more thoughtful comments. And I believe commenters would be less likely to throw insults at an identifiable person than at an abstraction like johnny99gogo. Of course, this may be an argument for the last century, anyway. Social media like Facebook and Twitter have changed the ways people share their thoughts with each other by promoting more selective communities. The comments section on stories and blogs may already be a dinosaur. What do you think? Are there other ways to promote smarter, more civil discourse. Chime in. But could you sign your real name? Dean Wright (formerly johnny99gogo)

What did you say your name was 

Page 1 of 1